> On 09 March 2017 at 08:02 Aleksander Morgado <aleksan...@aleksander.es> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Reinhard Speyerer <rs...@arcor.de> wrote:
> 
> > > I'll look for a command which can achieve the same test - perhaps the
> > > function could switch over to the alternative if it gets an
> > > 'unsupported' error? (My modems give a "+CME ERROR: 22")
> > 
> > Maybe AT^SSET would be worth a try as it was already supported by TC63 
> > modems:
> > 
> > AT^SSET=1
> >  OK
> >  AT+CPIN=xxxx
> >  OK
> >  ^SSIM READY
> >  AT^SSET=0
> >  OK
> 
> That's a totally acceptable thing indeed. We could enable AT^SSET=1
> early in the initialization and just wait for ^SSIM to be reported,
> maybe adding some additional "fallback wait time" in the case it isn't
> received, or something like that.
> 

I fear this may not be all that straight-forward to tackle - dunno if it's just 
them, but Cinterion seem to have great mastery in implementing different AT 
Command sets!
AT^SSET is available on the BGS2 module, but not on the [later!] EHS5....   :S
_______________________________________________
ModemManager-devel mailing list
ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel

Reply via email to