Tore Anderson <[email protected]> writes:
> After switching it to configuration #3 (MBIM) everything Just Worked
> without any further tinkering. I see the blog post author went for
> configuration #1 instead, and that looks more cumbersome pull off.
> Maybe it has any distinct advantage over MBIM mode he needed, I don't
> know.
Having access to the full power of QMI is an advantage if you want to do
"advanced" stuff like cell monitoring etc. But if you can run QMI over
MBIM, and then there is absolutely no reason to use the more cumbersome
configuration. MBIM is also the safer choice based on what most users
(Windows) will use.
Do you see 'qmi' in the MBIM service list?:
root@miraculix:/tmp# mbimcli -p -d /dev/cdc-wdm0 --query-device-services
[/dev/cdc-wdm0] Device services retrieved:
..
Service: 'qmi'
UUID: [d1a30bc2-f97a-6e43-bf65-c7e24fb0f0d3]:
DSS payload: 0
Max DSS instances: 0
CIDs: msg (1)
Bjørn
_______________________________________________
ModemManager-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel
