On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Aleksander Morgado
<aleksan...@aleksander.es> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Aleksander Morgado
> <aleksan...@aleksander.es> wrote:
>>> What you included here as a
>>> snippet is a huge bug actually.
>>
>> Well, not that huge really... the only issue is that we're setting the
>> GSimpleAsyncResult result twice to TRUE. But, of course, if the
>> parent's implementation isn't using a GSimpleAsyncResult and is using
>> a GTask instead (as in your case), there really would be a bug as a
>> GTask isn't a GSimpleAsyncResult :) So, let me fix as many of those
>> issues as I find in a quick look, and then publish your full branch
>> and we'll get it reviewed and merged.
>
> I did the following grep in the source code to find all places where
> we were casting explicitly to G_SIMPLE_ASYNC_RESULT when calling
> g_simple_async_result_set_op...():
>
>   $ grep -r "g_simple_async_result_set_op" . | grep "G_SIMPLE_ASYNC"
>
> And fixed all places reported.

Thanks for the quick fix.

>
> The rationale is that we usually explicitly use the GSimpleAsyncResult
> type instead of "gpointer" in the user_data passed to the async
> functions inside the async function we're implementing, so there
> usually is never the need to explicitly cast that to
> GSimpleAsyncResult again to call g_simple_async_result_set_op...().
> Where there was an explicit cast, the code was buggy.
>
> Please rebase your branch on top of master, include the missing
> commits you took out, and repush for review.

Done.

>
> --
> Aleksander
> https://aleksander.es
_______________________________________________
ModemManager-devel mailing list
ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel

Reply via email to