On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 18:37 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > > I’m testing mm 1.12.2 + libqmi 1.24.2 on sierra EM7565 (openwrt). > > > Please see last line of log. Is this ok? > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not see this in mm 1.12.0 + libqmi 1.24.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Enabling QMI > > > indications via MBIM... > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] enabled QMI > > > indications via MBIM > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: <info> [cdc-wdm0] MBIM device is > > > QMI capable > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Allocating new > > > client ID... > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Registered 'dms' > > > (version 1.0) client with ID '1' > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Allocating new > > > client ID... > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Registered 'nas' > > > (version 1.25) client with ID '2' > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Allocating new > > > client ID... > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Registered 'loc' > > > (version 2.0) client with ID '1' > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Allocating new > > > client ID... > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:38 OpenWrt [5904]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Registered 'pdc' > > > (version 1.0) client with ID '1' > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:39 OpenWrt [5904]: <info> QMI-based capability and > > > mode switching support enabled > > > > > > Dec 13 15:51:39 OpenWrt [5904]: <warn> couldn't load carrier > > > config: 'Cannot send message: QMI service 'pdc' version '1.15' > > > required, got version '1.0'' > > > > > > > I believe the issue is unrelated to the MM/libqmi version. It would > > be > > very strange that the modem replies differnet things when using > > different libqmi versions really. > > > > The problem, though, is something we should fix. The version checks > > done by libqmi are truly broken, because they rely on the version > > info > > for each message that is defined in our message database, and that > > information is far from good or up to date. If the message is not > > supported by the device, we'll get an error when trying to use it. > > Trying to return an early error before sending the request assuming > > our information of when it was introduced is good is not the way to > > go. > > > > See > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/libqmi/merge_requests/80 > > Comments welcome
I see you merged it 6 hours ago, but FWIW it looks good to me :) Dan > _______________________________________________ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel
