On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 03:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Speyerer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 01:56:34PM +0200, Fredrik Flornes Ellertsen wrote: > [...] > > <<<<<< TLV: > > <<<<<< type = 0x25 > > <<<<<< length = 8 > > <<<<<< value = 9F:18:0E:0A:40:00:00:00 > > <<<<<< TLV: > > <<<<<< type = 0x26 > > <<<<<< length = 8 > > <<<<<< value = 9F:18:0E:0A:00:00:00:00 > > <<<<<< TLV: > > <<<<<< type = 0x27 > > <<<<<< length = 17 > > <<<<<< value = 04:08:00:00:00:0A:00:00:00:0B:00:00:00:04:00:00:00 > > > > Resetting the modem doesn't help either. I am not sure whether this mailing > > list is the correct forum for this question or if I should ask Quectel > > about this. Any help is very much appreciated. > > > > Hi Fredrik, > > when looking at TLVs 0x24 and 0x25 one can see that their values when > interpreted as a LTE bandmask seem to match the values supported by the > BG96 for Cat-M1 and CAT-NB1. >
Sorry, that should read TLVs 0x25 and 0x26. Regards, Reinhard > My guess is that there would also be two additional extended LTE band > preference TLVs for MDM9205-based devices like Quectel BG95 and > Telit ME910G1 since they may support LTE bands > 64: > > Regards, > Reinhard > _______________________________________________ > ModemManager-devel mailing list > ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel _______________________________________________ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel
