Hello Pradeep,

Il giorno lun 6 gen 2025 alle ore 05:03 Pradeep Gopanapalli
<pradeep.gopanapa...@broadcom.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hello Daniele,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> Yes I had to add a similar patch for modemmanager.common for the mux 
> interface to work.
> After following the steps given below I am able to dial into Multiplex 
> interfaces.
> Now I need to figure out how to integrate maintaining state machines of these 
> interfaces into
> our modem scripts.
> Also does modemmanager allow combination of non-multiplex and multiplex 
> interface at same time?
>

As far as I know this is not possible, since the qmap configuration
affects the whole modem (see QMI_WDA_SET_DATA_FORMAT).

Regards,
Daniele

> Here are steps followed for successful multiplex interface creation
>
> >>
>
> mmcli -m any --command='AT#DUALAPN=1'
>
> mmcli -m a --command='AT+WS46=36'
>
> mmcli -m any --set-current-bands=ngran-71
>
> mmcli -m any --set-allowed-modes=5g
>
>
> <Delete any non multiplex bearers>
> #mmcli -m any --simple-connect="multiplex=required,apn=<>"
> #mmcli -m any --set-allowed-modes=5g
> #mmcli -m any --simple-connect="multiplex=required,profile-id=3,ip-type=ipv4"
>
> Thanks,
> Pradeep G
> << Disconnect bearer related to non-multiplex>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 1:52 AM Daniele Palmas <dnl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Pradeep,
>>
>> Il giorno ven 3 gen 2025 alle ore 02:37 Pradeep Gopanapalli
>> <pradeep.gopanapa...@broadcom.com> ha scritto:
>> >
>> > Hello Dan,
>> >
>> > First of all Happy new year and thanks for the reply.
>> > On further debugging it looks like we need a "rmnet" driver for  Netlink 
>> > creation as slice interfaces.
>> > https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/networking/device_drivers/cellular/qualcomm/rmnet.html
>> > However Native Opernwrt -23.05 didn't had this module as part of packages, 
>> > so i had to compile it as a module
>> > Kernel : 5.15.168
>> >
>> >
>> > I followed these steps
>> > -mmcli -m a --command='AT+WS46=36'
>> > insmod rmnet.ko
>> >
>> > <Delete all non-mux bearers>
>> >
>> > mmcli -m any 
>> > --simple-connect="multiplex=requested,profile-id=1,ip-type=ipv4v6"
>> >
>> >
>> > And qmapmux0.0 creation failed with "imed out waiting for link port 
>> > 'net/qmapmux0.0'"
>> >
>>
>> looks like something similar to the issue describe at
>> http://paldan.altervista.org/openwrt-modemmanager-and-a-multiplexing-issue/
>>
>> though the suspicious line is a bit different:
>>
>> hotplug: add network interface qmapmux0.0: event ignored: couldn't get
>> physical device sysfs path
>>
>> Anyway, I fixed the issue reported above with
>> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/23551
>>
>> If that does not work for you it could be a starting point for further
>> investigation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniele
>>
>> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > = 1#012<<<<<<   value      = 03#012<<<<<<   translated = 
>> > ipv4-or-ipv6#012<<<<<< TLV:#012<<<<<<   type       = "Profile Name" 
>> > (0x10)#012<<<<<<   length     = 8#012<<<<<<   value      = 
>> > 70:72:6F:66:69:6C:65:31#012<<<<<<   translated = profile1#012
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:05.468 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> 
>> > [modem0/cdc-wdm0/qmi] multiplex support already available when setting up 
>> > data format
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:05.468 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> 
>> > [modem0/cdc-wdm0/qmi] Creating RMNET link with flags: ingress-map-cksumv5, 
>> > egress-map-cksumv5
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:05.486 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> Using 
>> > dynamic mux ID 1
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:05.489 NOTICE daemon ModemManager[32225]: <msg> 
>> > [modem0/bearer2] net link qmapmux0.0 created (mux id 1)
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:05.489 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> [modem0] 
>> > waiting for port 'net/qmapmux0.0'...
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:05.492 INFO   daemon linkd[7283]: create 
>> > None(qmapmux0.0): state=->down, oper=->down, carrier=->1
>> > 2025-01-03T01:06:47.253 WARNIN user   kernel:[1451352.659164] ethtool: 
>> > net: disabled offload features for qmapmux0.0
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:05.614 INFO   daemon ModemManager[50632]: hotplug: add 
>> > network interface qmapmux0.0: event ignored: couldn't get physical device 
>> > sysfs path
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:07.991 WARNIN daemon ModemManager[32225]: <wrn> 
>> > [modem0/bearer2] connection attempt #1 failed: Timed out waiting for link 
>> > port 'net/qmapmux0.0'
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:07.991 NOTICE daemon ModemManager[32225]: <msg> [modem0] 
>> > state changed (connecting -> registered)
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:07.992 NOTICE daemon ModemManager[32225]: <msg> 
>> > [modem0/bearer2] connection #1 finished: duration 0s
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:07.992 WARNIN daemon ModemManager[32225]: <wrn> [modem0] 
>> > couldn't connect bearer: Timed out waiting for link port 'net/qmapmux0.0'
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:07.997 INFO   daemon linkd[7283]: change 
>> > None(qmapmux0.0): state=down->down, oper=down->down, carrier=1->1
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:08.004 INFO   daemon ModemManager[50807]: hotplug: remove 
>> > network interface qmapmux0.0: event processed
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:08.015 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> 
>> > [base-manager] kernel event reported:
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:08.015 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> 
>> > [base-manager]   action:    remove
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:08.015 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> 
>> > [base-manager]   subsystem: net
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:08.015 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> 
>> > [base-manager]   name:      qmapmux0.0
>> > 2025-01-03T01:07:08.015 DEBUG  daemon ModemManager[32225]: <dbg> 
>> > [base-manager]   uid:       n/a
>> >
>> >
>> >  Thanks,
>> >
>> > Pradeep G
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 10:44 AM Dan Williams <d...@ioncontrol.co> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, 2024-12-29 at 19:08 -0800, Pradeep Gopanapalli wrote:
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> > I am trying to establish multiple 5G multiplex slices on a Telit
>> >> > FN990 modem running in QMI mode. These 5G slices represent multiple
>> >> > PDNs managed by ModemManager (via mmcli).
>> >> >
>> >> > When using the "--test-multiplex-requested" option, the bearer setup
>> >> > fails with the following Netlink error:
>> >> > GDBus.Error:org.gtk.GDBus.UnmappedGError.Quark._g_2dio_2derror_2dquar
>> >> > k.Code0: failed to create net link for device: failed to add link for
>> >> > device: Could not allocate link: Failed to add link with mux id 1:
>> >> > Netlink message with transaction 9 failed
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately libqmi-glib doesn't print out the actual error we get
>> >> from netlink, which I've fixed here:
>> >>
>> >> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/libqmi/-/merge_requests/389
>> >>
>> >> would you be able to apply that patch locally and reproduce the issue,
>> >> so that we can figure out the actual error code netlink is returning?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Dan
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Environment:
>> >> >  * Modem: Telit FN990A28 in QMI mode
>> >> >  * ModemManager: 1.22.0
>> >> >  * libqmi: 1.34.0-2
>> >> >  * libmbim: 1.30.0-2
>> >> >  * Kernel: 5.15.150
>> >> >  * OpenWrt: Based on 22.03 using netifd
>> >> > Debug Logs During Bearer Connection:
>> >> > (PFA message_modem_debug)
>> >> > 2024-12-28T00:38:03.709 DEBUG daemon ModemManager[9676]:
>> >> > [1735346283.709521] [modem0/bearer1] connecting...
>> >> > 2024-12-28T00:38:03.709 NOTICE daemon ModemManager[9676]:
>> >> > [1735346283.709796] [modem0] state changed (registered -> connecting)
>> >> > 2024-12-28T00:38:03.709 DEBUG daemon ModemManager[9676]:
>> >> > [1735346283.709904] [modem0/bearer1] launching connection with QMI
>> >> > port (cdc-wdm0) and data port (wwan0) (multiplex requested)
>> >> > 2024-12-28T00:38:03.709 DEBUG daemon ModemManager[9676]:
>> >> > [1735346283.709916] [cdc-wdm0/qmi] bringing down data interface
>> >> > 'wwan0'
>> >> > 2024-12-28T00:38:03.710 DEBUG daemon ModemManager[9676]:
>> >> > [1735346283.710309] [cdc-wdm0/qmi] resetting expected kernel data
>> >> > format to 802.3 in data interface 'wwan0'
>> >> > 2024-12-28T00:38:03.897 WARN daemon ModemManager[9676]:
>> >> > [1735346283.897197] [modem0/bearer1] connection attempt #1 failed:
>> >> > failed to create net link for device: failed to add link for device:
>> >> > Could not allocate link: Failed to add link with mux id 1: Netlink
>> >> > message with transaction 1 failed
>> >> > 2024-12-28T00:38:03.898 NOTICE daemon netifd: CELL1 (19170): error:
>> >> > couldn't connect the modem:
>> >> > 'GDBus.Error:org.gtk.GDBus.UnmappedGError.Quark._g_2dio_2derror_2dqua
>> >> > rk.Code0: failed to create net link for device: failed to add link
>> >> > for device: Could not allocate link: Failed to add link with mux id
>> >> > 1: Netlink message with transaction 1 failed'
>> >> > Similar Issue Reported:
>> >> > This issue has been reported in the following GitLab issue:
>> >> > GitLab ModemManager Issue #533, but I have not seen a resolution for
>> >> > it.
>> >> > Reference Links:
>> >> >  * ModemManager Mailing List - March 2022
>> >> > Any assistance or suggestions on resolving this issue would be
>> >> > greatly appreciated.
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Pradeep G
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > This electronic communication and the information and any files
>> >> > transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are
>> >> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
>> >> > addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally
>> >> > privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from
>> >> > disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or
>> >> > the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended
>> >> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying,
>> >> > distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this
>> >> > e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
>> >> > please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer,
>> >> > and destroy any printed copy of it.
>> >>
>> >
>> > This electronic communication and the information and any files 
>> > transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended 
>> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and 
>> > may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged, 
>> > protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to 
>> > anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or the person 
>> > responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are 
>> > hereby notified that any use, copying, distributing, dissemination, 
>> > forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If 
>> > you received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender, 
>> > delete it from your computer, and destroy any printed copy of it.
>
>
> This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
> with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for the 
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
> information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
> laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are not 
> the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to 
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying, 
> distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail 
> is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please return 
> the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and destroy any 
> printed copy of it.

Reply via email to