Hi :) All true However if something reaches this list it has already been rejected. We just try to rescue the ones that were valid and sent here by mistake. Regards from Tom :)
>________________________________ > From: Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]> >To: anne-ology <[email protected]> >Cc: Tom Davies <[email protected]>; Florian Effenberger ><[email protected]>; "[email protected]" ><[email protected]> >Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 15:08 >Subject: Re: [tdf-moderators] Fwd: Please moderate >[email protected]: Software Solutions for Small, Medium & Large >Businesses > > >this isnt replying to the spammer this is replying to the server telling it >to reject the message. > >thanks to google this saved this address automatically > >this is what i am replying to discuss+reject-2521220c3d6c2f84 < >[email protected]> which tells mlmmj >to reject the email and not post it to the list. > > >On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, anne-ology <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There's a problem with replying to a spammer; in that way you're >> merely acknowledging that the e-address is valid. >> >> To my way of thinking, that's a bad thing to do; isn't it better to >> ignore & hope the spammer will give up. >> >> Also, these spammers tend to use slightly different e-addresses in >> order to fool the system, so rejecting one will not reject the next ones >> ;-( >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Jonathan Aquilina >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> Isn't that the same thing as emailing back saying reject? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Tom Davies <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi :) >>> > I get the impression that if we do nothing then the message gets >>> blocked. >>> > So if you don't like a message or think it's spam then it's fine to >>> leave >>> > it. >>> > >>> > We are mainly trying to catch the ones that should not have been blocked >>> > in order to unblock them. >>> > Regard from >>> > Tom :) >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > From: Florian Effenberger <[email protected]> >>> > >To: [email protected] >>> > >Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 14:28 >>> > >Subject: Re: [tdf-moderators] Fwd: Please moderate >>> > [email protected]: Software Solutions for Small, Medium & >>> > Large Businesses >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >Hi Jonathan, >>> > > >>> > >Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-05-09 15:20: >>> > >> florian any chance you can black list this domain as this is the 3rd >>> > email >>> > >> today from the same company in the span of a few hrs to the mirrors >>> > list i >>> > >> have rejected them all but still its very annoying that they are >>> still >>> > >> pushing to spam the list. >>> > > >>> > >let's not block individual domains. Usually, one blocks the sending >>> > >server's IP, not the sender domain. >>> > > >>> > >Plus, moderation is all about spam filtering. Manually maintaining >>> > >filter lists is a tedious tasks I really would like to avoid, because >>> > >you have to regularly verify those lists (who can assure that the IP >>> has >>> > >not changed the owner to a legitimate sender in the meantime?). >>> > > >>> > >We do extensive spam filtering already with greylisting, blacklists, >>> > >SpamAssassin the the like. The spam that gets through is the tasks >>> > >moderators have to deal with. >>> > > >>> > >Florian >>> > > >>> >> > > >-- >Jonathan Aquilina > >-- >To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] >Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
