In a message dated 10/29/99 2:00:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< (like Kevorkian's lawyer, the
 guy that ran in Michigan AND LOST >>

Jeffrey Figer is the guy's name, though I may be misspelling that.  He's the 
brother of the lead singer of the Knack (My Sharona!).  I liked to think he 
was a good guy, too, the way he defended kevorkian and whatnot.  but he's 
more interested in the publicity (take note of the fact that he's 
spearheading the lawsuits from the parents of columbine students - as if the 
school should be held liable.  or the kids' parents. or any of the other 
organizations he's suing. . . all within about two weeks from the actual 
massacre.)

<<Now, Jesse Ventura may be a little weird, but he's pro-marijuana and
anti-organized-religion (check out his Playboy interview), so there may
at least be a tiny bit of hope for the Reform Party.>>
Why is pro-marijuana and anti-organized religion the things that make you 
think he's a good representative.  If this is how you would sum up his 
possible campaign in the case that he would ever run, it's hopeless.  Must 
people aren't "pro-marijuana", "anti-organized religion" and "a little 
weird".  
Now, (and after much skepticism - i thought it funny when he was elected 
governor) I happen to think that in the rare event, Jesse Ventura could 
possibly make a good president, because he has some good ideas about the 
governments' place in the public's personal lives - i.e., they should remain 
separate, for the most part.  He actually does seem to be a fairly 
intelligent guy who just hasn't mastered the censor button that seems to be 
so necessary for a politician to continue within the peoples' favor.  this is 
unfortunate, but true.
i don't do drugs, at all.  but i don't think that our jails should be filling 
up with drug users and dealers, and i think mandatory minimum laws are 
absolutely ridiculous.  but it seriously bugs me when people glom onto things 
that are pro-pot simply because they are such.  as much as people like to 
think of radical change happening through sloganeering, im sorry to say, but 
subversion is the way to go in the u.s.
likewise (and unrelated, other than the fact that jesse ventura seems to 
think this too), i don't see prostitutes, but i think the illegality of 
prostitution is also ridiculous, and a product of a twisted and hypocritical 
moral system.  sex =  bad, let those who choose to deal in it fend themselves 
from disease and crime.  prostitution will happen; the government could do 
well by protecting those that choose to sell themselves, much like in nevada.

<<He went a bit far
in saying that religion is a crutch for the "weak"; in my book, we ALL
have our crutches.  Mine are love, music, drugs, and
god/goddess/gods/goddesses, in that order.>>

in agreement.

star

Reply via email to