> Stas Bekman wrote:
> > 
> > Sure, compile static mod_perl. DSO is not stable.
> > 
> 
> Stas - 
> 
> Not stable? Thats news to me and probably a lot of others who build DSO
> modules for apache this way. OK, what is the best way to build it
> statically?

Well, I don't have the numbers, but think about 40% of problem reported
lately were due to DSO builds. Once backed to static the problems were
reported to be gone.

I don't use DSO, may be someone who does can clear things out? Why there
are so many problems with DSO. The best answer I heard so far: "DSO isn't
stabilized yet." So I have just repeated it for you, Michael. 

Come on, are we on a techical list or what? Anybody care/know to explain
when this [DSO] would change for good? I could dig the info about DSO at
apache.org, but it doesn't help...

_______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]    www.singlesheaven.com/stas  
Perl,CGI,Apache,Linux,Web,Java,PC at  www.singlesheaven.com/stas/TULARC
www.apache.org  & www.perl.com  == www.modperl.com  ||  perl.apache.org
single o-> + single o-+ = singlesheaven    http://www.singlesheaven.com

Reply via email to