On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 02:12:11PM -0500, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 12:02:27AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >
> > I think the close() does the wait, so I don't really need to worry about
> > reaping my children.
>
> You are right here. close() does implicit wait on child to finish.
> I don't really understand why are you getting SIGPIPE. That signal is
> supposed to come only when you WRITE to the pipe and pipe dies. At
> least in my tests I could get that signal from pipes that I read from.
Sorry I meant to say that I couldn't get SIGPIPE from pipes open for read.
