>>>>> "JB" == Jason Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JB> Actually, prior art prohibits something from being patented. If JB> somebody can demonstrate that the pantented concept is not new due JB> to prior art then the patent office will not issue the patent. So, to all of you, what does this have to do with mod_perl? This certainly is not a patent-reform mailing list. Please take this discussion somewhere more appropriate. Thanks.
- VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Cliff Rayman
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Randy Harmon
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Jason Bodnar
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Vivek Khera
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Jason Bodnar
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Joshua Chamas
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Stas Bekman
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Cliff Rayman
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent G.W. Haywood
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Cliff Rayman
- RE: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Gerald Richter
- Re: VirtualSellers.com TAME patent Cliff Rayman