At 9:39 AM -0400 6/22/00, Vivek Khera wrote: > >I use the include virtual in some situations. If you want the query >string, just append it: > > <!--#include virtual="/path/to/program?$QUERY_STRING" --> Do you happen to know if there's any performance difference between using the include and virtual and using the following: <!--#perl sub="Apache::Include" arg="/perl/ssi.pl" --> The book Professional Apache says this is more efficient than include virtual since it allows scripts to be persistent, but I don't see how they would not be using include virtual. Thanks for the reply, I appreciate the time. - mt
- RE: [OT] [JOB] mod_perl and Apache developers wanted Paul Singh
- RE: [OT] [JOB] mod_perl and Apache developers wa... Perrin Harkins
- RE: [OT] [JOB] mod_perl and Apache developer... Paul Singh
- Re: [OT] [JOB] mod_perl and Apache devel... Ed Phillips
- Enough about etoys! Jeff Gleixner
- Re: [OT] Enough about etoys! Gunther Birznieks
- Any reason not to SSI include Regist... Michael Todd Glazier
- RE: Any reason not to SSI include Re... Kenneth Lee
- Re: Any reason not to SSI include Re... darren chamberlain
- Re: Any reason not to SSI include Re... Vivek Khera
- Re: Any reason not to SSI include Re... Michael Todd Glazier
- Re: Any reason not to SSI include Re... Vivek Khera
- Re: [OT] [JOB] mod_perl and Apache developers wanted Billy Donahue