Dave Kaufman wrote:
>
> i have to say i really like the look and feel of Matt's take23.org. (and by
> the way, for those, like me, who can't seem to keep up with reading *every*
> message on this list... it's take23.ORG. I went looking for "take23" and i
> can attest that the cryptic but nicely designed take23.COM, has nothing at
> all to do with mod_perl on it :-))
I vaguely remember seeing mockups similar to take23.org as a proposed facelift
for perl.apache.org. I really liked the design and always wondered why it
never got used (apart from the manhours to implement the change :-)
> i for one would like to see take23.org become "the place" for people
> deciding if mod_perl is for them, getting started with it, and keeping up
> with the latest and greatest. i did turn my nose up at the banners at
> first, but on second thought, i'm even more *thoroughly* sick of open-source
> resource sites that are plain (unintesting, visually) and whose content is
> stale due to a lackluster (volunteer) maintenance. so, if some ad-income
> keeps take23 fresh and useful, i think i could be bothered to remember the
> URL :-)
A quick check of nsiregistry.com shows that modperlnews.(com|org|net) are all
available. Those domains are definately a little easier to remember than
take23. What are some other alternatives to take23.org that would be easier on
the grey matter?
--
Drew Taylor
Software Engineer
OpenAir.com - Making Business a Breeze!
Open a free account today at www.openair.com