I would agree with Matt.
It's a matter of style... I think if you made a 1-1 POD and XML tagset, it
wouldn't be too many tags.
The thing that makes POD easier to diff is that the commands appear on
single lines... but if you do something like
<code>
Some code
</code>
I don't think that it would be so hard to read a diff.
However, with that said, I think more Perl people are familiar with a
simple POD.
Did I just go round a circle? Whoops.
At 10:02 AM 12/14/00 -0500, Khachaturov, Vassilii wrote:
>I believe there are structural differs for XML (I remember there was a perl
>script sgmldiff back 6 years ago!), which can be plugged into cvs
>environment for this type of files. If you want, I can dig further into it.
>
>Vassilii
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 8:17 AM
>To: Stas Bekman
>Cc: Randal L. Schwartz; mod_perl list
>Subject: Re: Mod_perl tutorials
>
>
> > Even cvs diffs with XML won't be very easy to read, because there are too
> > many tags.
>
>Thats a non-argument. XML can have as many or as few tags as POD.
__________________________________________________
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/