On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:35:18PM +0000, Ged Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Fister, Mark wrote: > > > Tried that. Note: you also tried to help a fellow back in November of > > 2001 on this VERY same stack trace. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/modperl/message/39560 > > Heh, didn't get very far with Lynx on that URL... > does anybody know what happened to that one? > > > > You've obviously read the docs, so I take it the same compiler built > > > Aapche, mod_perl and Perl. Have you tried this on RH6.2 with the > > > compiler that came with that? > > > > Yes. Note also: the problem didn't use to happen with perl 5.00404, > > mod_perl 1.08 and apache 1.3b5 (with exactly the same codebase). > > 5.00404 ?? 1.08 !?!... > > Ah. Now we're getting somewhere. Maybe. Why not try Perl 5.7.2? > I'm using it in development, did some pretty heavy stuff with 5.7.0 > and it was fine, then I ran into SIGSEVs and things trying to do some > simple profiling with Devel::DProf on some simple code (heavy data:) > which went away when I installed 5.7.2. (BTW thanks Stas!:)
Tried 5.7.2. I still have core dumps. This is why I decided to try the mod_perl list instead of p5p. I'm definitely nearly in tears. :( NOTE: some of our Apache-based servers have no problem with the same Apache/Perl/mod_perl that we're running. However, others do... and trying to do module list comparisons between the ones that do and don't doesn't come up with anything definitive. > 73, > Ged. -- \_/} Mark P. Fister Java, Java, everywhere, and all \_/} \_/} eBay, Inc. the cups did shrink; Java, Java \_/} \_/} Austin, TX everywhere, nor any drop to drink! \_/}
