That rings a bell. I think that the problem was that a secondary required file for the db.h for one of the versions db3 I believe is not a part of the RedHat install and that relinking the db.h file didn't help. It was at that point that I went to sleepcat.com to get the complete kit and installed from there.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Nicholas Studt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:32 AM > To: Joe Breeden > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem With DB_File Installation On Red-Hat > Linux 7.1 [OT] > > > > Joe Breeden wrote [ 2002/03/14 at 09:15:44 ] > > > > It has been a few weeks since I went through this and I have seen a > > squirrel or two since then and it was a bad experience so I > have tried > > to block the memories of the awful awful day. I hope this > helps, but I > > doubt it will. Good luck. > > A much easier fix specfically for Redhat 7.1 is to correctly link > /usr/include/db.h to the same version of the /lib that DB_File is > picking up. Redhat has versions 1, 2, and 3 of Berkeley db > installed to > support all of the applications. If you relink db.h, > generally pointing > it to db2/db.h ( though it may be db3/db.h or db1/db.h > depending on the > rest of the stuff you have installed ) will make DB_file happy. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: James McKim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:01 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Problem With DB_File Installation On Red-Hat Linux 7.1 > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to install DB_File on our Red-Hat Linux. 7.1 > box and am > > > getting an error about having 2 versions of BerkeleyDB > installed. The > > > log of the installation follows. Any help would be appreciated. > > | nicholas l studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | GPG: 0EBE 38F2 342C A857 E85B 2472 B85E C538 E1E0 8808 > `------------------------------------------------------- >
