Wouldn't this be worthy of being logged in Changes ? On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 12:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > randyk 2003/07/05 21:51:20 > > Modified: src/modules/perl Apache.xs > Log: > Workaround to allow compiling with Win32 ActivePerl 8xx, which > introduced LARGE_FILES support. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.128 +15 -1 modperl/src/modules/perl/Apache.xs > > Index: Apache.xs > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl/src/modules/perl/Apache.xs,v > retrieving revision 1.127 > retrieving revision 1.128 > diff -u -r1.127 -r1.128 > --- Apache.xs 14 Mar 2003 06:05:06 -0000 1.127 > +++ Apache.xs 6 Jul 2003 04:51:20 -0000 1.128 > @@ -1962,8 +1962,22 @@ > croak("statbuf is not an object"); > } > } > - > +/* workaround for USE_LARGE_FILES on WIN32 ActivePerl 8xx */ > +#if defined(WIN32) && defined(USE_LARGE_FILES) > + statcache.st_dev = r->finfo.st_dev; > + statcache.st_ino = r->finfo.st_ino; > + statcache.st_mode = r->finfo.st_mode; > + statcache.st_nlink = r->finfo.st_nlink; > + statcache.st_uid = r->finfo.st_uid; > + statcache.st_gid = r->finfo.st_gid; > + statcache.st_rdev = r->finfo.st_rdev; > + statcache.st_size = (__int64) r->finfo.st_size; > + statcache.st_atime = r->finfo.st_atime; > + statcache.st_mtime = r->finfo.st_mtime; > + statcache.st_ctime = r->finfo.st_ctime; > +#else > statcache = r->finfo; > +#endif > if (r->finfo.st_mode) { > laststatval = 0; > sv_setpv(statname, r->filename); > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part