stas        2003/09/18 01:48:31

  Modified:    .        Changes
  Log:
  log the important to user recent changes
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.217     +23 -0     modperl-2.0/Changes
  
  Index: Changes
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/Changes,v
  retrieving revision 1.216
  retrieving revision 1.217
  diff -u -u -r1.216 -r1.217
  --- Changes   12 Sep 2003 18:11:04 -0000      1.216
  +++ Changes   18 Sep 2003 08:48:31 -0000      1.217
  @@ -12,6 +12,29 @@
   
   =item 1.99_10-dev
   
  +it is invalid to return HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR or any other HTTP
  +response code from modperl_wbucket_pass, therefore set the error code
  +into r->status and return APR_SUCCESS. Untill now response handler
  +with messed up response headers, were causing no response what so ever
  +to the client.  LWP was assuming 500, and it was all fine, testing
  +without LWP has immediately revealed that there was a problem in the
  +handling of this case. [Stas]
  +
  +put the end to the 'Not a CODE reference' errors, instead provide an
  +intelligent error message, hopefully telling which function can't be
  +found.  at the same time improve the tracing to include the pid/tid of
  +the server that has encountered this problem, to make it easier to
  +debug. [Stas]
  +
  +mod_perl handler must be dupped for any mpm which runs within
  +USE_ITHREAD.  Untill now there was a big problem with prefork mpm if
  +any of its vhosts was using PerlOptions +(Parent|Clone) and happened
  +to load handlers before the main server. When that was happening the
  +main server will see that the handler was resolved (since it sees the
  +handler struct from the vhost that loaded this module, instead of its
  +own), which in fact it wasn't, causing the failure to run the handler
  +with the infamous 'Not a CODE reference' error. [Stas]
  +
   Make sure that the static mod_perl library is built after the dynamic
   (a requirement on win32) [Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
   
  
  
  

Reply via email to