I use it all the time to define subroutines.
They do not return values the way normal subroutines do however.
Perhaps Gerald needs to modify the documentation to reflect his.
cliff rayman
genwax.com
Jason Bodnar wrote:
> Can the new sub meta-command not be used to define functions?
>
> I tried:
>
> [$ sub foo $]
> [+ shift +]
> [$ endsub $]
> [+ sub("bar") +]
>
> and got 0.
> ---
> Jason Bodnar + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + Tivoli Systems
>
> That boy doesn't know the difference between the Internet and a hair net. --
> Jason Bodnar
