On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, G.W. Haywood wrote:
[snip snip]
> For me, your slapdash approach has polluted the mod_perl resource to
> the extent that now I don't trust any of it. The entire exercise is
> written off to experience and I am looking for alternatives.
Hey, Jeffrey Baker didn't write mod_perl or the mod_perl test suite.
Why pick on him? He's just trying to help. What he said was that failed tests
don't necessarily mean the server won't work.
> Earlier in November, Stas Bekman put out a message saying something
> like: "Come on, guys, let's get some of this stuff to work".
We're looking forward to your contributions: bug reports, patches,
whatever. However when someone reports a failure of some sort on this
list, it's not all that easy to turn that into a fix.
> Surely no-one can be content with the state things are in at present?
We never are, in fact that's why many people bother to send in bug reports and
patches. You can see for yourself by perusing the current CVS tree.
> Kind regards,
> Ged Haywood.
Best,
--
Eric Cholet
