On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Brian S. Craigie wrote: > I presume from the lack of response that nobody knows the answer to this > one? Or have I sent this to the wrong mailing list? Or is it a stupid > question? or because you just posted on monday and some people have been extra super buzy with other things? have a look at the cvs snapshot and the Changes file, the problem was fixed a while back: if $r->bytes_sent has not been calculated, then do so before returning the value. thanks to Dirk Melchers for the spot
- PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero for proxy requests Brian S. Craigie
- Re: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero for proxy r... Brian S. Craigie
- Re: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero for pro... Doug MacEachern
- Re: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero for... Brian S. Craigie
- Re: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero... Doug MacEachern
- Re: PerlLogHandler - bytes always... Brian S. Craigie
- RE: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero for proxy r... Eric Cholet
- Re: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero for pro... Brian S. Craigie
- Re: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero for... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero... Brian S. Craigie
- RE: PerlLogHandler - bytes always zero for proxy r... Eric Cholet