Stas,
Keep working on your tutorial book for mod_perl. I hope that you
guys are writing it in a similar style to the "Learning Perl" book.
the Learning Perl book got me up and running on Perl rather quickly.
Then when I referenced the "Programming Perl" book for specific
information I understood.
I believe that this is one of may ways to get mod_perl understood
and used by the masses. Having a beginner book to the Eagle book
would be one way to educate other programmers to start using mod_perl.
You have my support!!
-tom
At 02:54 PM 12/3/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>We are thinking about providing courses, so far the conferences were the
>only place the tutorials were given. At the upcoming apacheCon 2000 it
>seems that I would be the only person talking about mod_perl :( But this
>time I would do it for 7 hours :)
>
>Regarding the tutorial books, Eric and me are working on such a book :)
>
>> Of course, that's what I *always* think about any shortage, which is
>> why Stonehenge makes money. :)
>>
>> The other thing I always think is "Hey, maybe I should quit what I'm
>> doing and go full time into mod_perl hacking." The problem is that
>> this doesn't scale. :)
>
>That's can be changed, the question is how many people wish to contribute
>and make the mod_perl the technology of choice. There are too few articles
>about mod_perl. I do write for perlmonth.com, and there are articles about
>mod_perl in TPJ. You write about mod_perl in your wonderful WebTechniques
>columns. But there are so many other online magazines, I wish more folks
>would write articles and make a better name for mod_perl.
>
--
Tom Law
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
