[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote:
>> >Regading Apache::SafeHang, I'll wait for your comments before I upload it
>> >to CPAN. Please try to use it.
>>
>> If this might become a more general utility, you might want to give
>> it a more general name like Apache::Watchdog or something so it has
>> room to grow. SafeHang kind of sounds like it might have something to
>> do with the Safe.pm module, too.
>
>Interesting. Actually that's why I'm not releasing it yet. I've packaged
>it so it would be easier for you to install and try it. But yes, the name
>isn't final and your suggestions sounds like a better one.
>
>The question is: what other functionality would you like to see?
Hmm - well, if it's polling the server every so often, it might as well
generate a periodic report of what it finds. How many processes, how long each
has been running, how much memory, etc.
Personally I find my Apache processes to be pretty well-behaved, so I'm not
speaking of actual needs I have, but rather just neat features you might add.
------------------- -------------------
Ken Williams Last Bastion of Euclidity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Math Forum
