Just read the mod_ssl vs. apache_ssl thread at /.org:
http://slashdot.org/apache/99/12/22/1711203.shtml
jimjag claims that DSO is slower than static builds at the runtime:
<QUOTE>
Q: Why has using DSOs anything to do with run-time performance? I always
thought using DSOs just slows down the startup.
A: Not at all. The code produced with DSOs, as well as the way modules are
implemented, is less optimal than the non-DSO alternative. If you need
best performance, avoid DSO. This is covered in the Apache performance
docs.
</QUOTE>
What do DSO benefactors have to say :)
The rest of the thread includes some interesting notes too, for those
running mod_perl in bundle with some SSL module... Unfortunately the
thread isn't formatted as thread and thus it's hard to read...
_______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stason.org/stas
Perl,CGI,Apache,Linux,Web,Java,PC http://www.stason.org/stas/TULARC
perl.apache.org modperl.sourcegarden.org perlmonth.com perl.org
single o-> + single o-+ = singlesheaven http://www.singlesheaven.com
