>>>>> "Doug" == Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Doug> Apache::RegistryNG uses the filename instead of uri. uri was
Doug> chosen because there used to be a limit to the length of Perl
Doug> package names. and regardless, shorter package name based on
Doug> the uri uses less memory and provides a faster lookup than the
Doug> filename.
I see Apache::RegistryNG @ISA Apache::PerlRun. Furthermore, perldoc
Apache::PerlRun states the following:
The Apache::Registry handler is much faster than
Apache::PerlRun. However, Apache::PerlRun is much faster
than CGI ...
This would seem to imply Apache::Registry is also much faster than
Apache::RegistryNG. Apart from the filename vs. uri namespace
difference and the OO nature of Apache::RegistryNG, are there any
compelling reasons to consider RegistryNG over Registry?
Peace.
