>From: Nicolas MONNET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Valter Mazzola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: NT/IIS/PerlEx vs ASP : stupid benckmark >Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:35:00 +0200 (CEST) > >On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Valter Mazzola wrote: >|i've made a stupid unscientific benckmark: >| >|the program loops 1000000 and print a series of "a ", PerlEx takes the >same >|time as ASP (same NT machine) , BUT processor goes 100% with PerlEx, 45% >|with ASP. >| >|Can someone benchmark mod_perl under Win32, using the same stupid program >? > >I don't mean to be rude, but this is one stupid benchmark! Basically >useless for that matter. You're not going to demonstrate anything with >this. > i agree with you, really. But this is a numeric result, and a bit significative: if you print a lot, asp 'seems' better. >Now a good question is: what would be a good benchmark? an average script choosen from the hundreds that we make db+file ... > >What about doing some real life stuff, like get big results from a >database, and calculate something over them, and print the (big?) result >back? > i agree also for this (see my posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]), i've written this (very) stupid in the hope that someone do better (and is simple...) >(Now this is not flamebait, I'm really wondering: why run mod_perl apps on >WinNT? ) > (because my company doesn't use unix/linux but WinNt+asp, and i stress everyday about linux/perl ...) hello Nicolas (sorry for my probably bad english) valter ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
