On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
>
> > Does this mean that we {will|may} be able to use the interpreter pool to
> > set up X Perl interpreters (say 20 to service dynamic handlers) with Z
> > apache (say 60 to handle static + dynamic content - assuming the dynamic
> > content is passed to the Perl interpreters) children, and hence have
> > significant memory savings as we can avoid (in some cases) the light / heavy
> > httpd model ?
>
> yes, exactly.
But you will be not able to tune the two types of the threads to have
different Apache parameters (MaxRequests and others) so I'm not sure you
will get rid of the dual setup, unless these will be taken care of by
mod_perl.
______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman | JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ | mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://perl.org http://stason.org/TULARC/
http://singlesheaven.com| http://perlmonth.com http://sourcegarden.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
