On 29 Apr 2000, Greg Stark wrote: > Despite these concerns I've been using mod_proxy myself and it does work. I'm > planning to change to mod_backhand though which implements 3) but it's new > code. Let me know how that works out for you. I tried to implement backhand, but it simply did not have its own basic functionality. That is, it could not start, stop, or forward connections with anything approaching reliability. I'd be keenly interested if it actually works at your site. -jwb
- Re: [RFC] modproxy:modperl rati... Leslie Mikesell
- Re: [RFC] modproxy:modperl rati... Vivek Khera
- Re: [RFC] modproxy:modperl rati... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [RFC] modproxy:modperl rati... Vivek Khera
- Re: [RFC] modproxy:modperl rati... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [RFC] modproxy:modperl rati... Perrin Harkins
- Re: modproxy:modperl ratios... Greg Stark
- Re: modproxy:modperl ratios... shane
- PerlSendHeader Benjamin Reed
- Re: PerlSendHeader Frank D. Cringle
- Re: modproxy:modperl ratios... Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: modproxy:modperl ratios... Vivek Khera
- Re[2]: [RFC] modproxy:modperl r... Ilya Obshadko
- Re: [RFC] modproxy:modperl rati... Vivek Khera
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory usage. shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory usage. Doug MacEachern
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory us... shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memor... Doug MacEachern
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... ... shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Doug MacEachern
- RE: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory usage. Paul G. Weiss