On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Ok, you'd get surprised on this one. I cannot make benchmark show me
> unbuffered output worse than buffered. Anyone can tell me why? there is
> ap_flash call after each print in the unbuffered case, how comes the
> results are the same?
I assume that's ap_flush ;-)
I'd guess this is probably OS dependant to do with socket libraries and
such. But I'm just guessing. It's probably also to do with the size of the
output.
I'm sorry I flamed the original benchmark, but now you've done some more
real tests, I'm not sorry, if you see what I mean ;-)
--
<Matt/>
Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
Email for training and consultancy availability.
http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org
