Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques

[Gisle Aas]

Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> And the results are:
> 
>   single_print:  1 wallclock secs ( 1.74 usr +  0.05 sys =  1.79 CPU)
>   here_print:    3 wallclock secs ( 1.79 usr +  0.07 sys =  1.86 CPU)
>   list_print:    7 wallclock secs ( 6.57 usr +  0.01 sys =  6.58 CPU)
>   multi_print:  10 wallclock secs (10.72 usr +  0.03 sys = 10.75 CPU)
> 
> Numbers tell it all, I<'single_print'> is the fastest, 'here_print' is
> almost of the same speed,

'single_print' and 'here_print' compile down to exactly the same code,
so there should not be any real difference between them.

-- 
Gisle Aas