I'd strongly disagree that this is not true.
Covalent intends to make a significant commitment to making sure that Apache
2.0 on Win32 is on par with the Unix platform's stability and performance.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kip Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 4:00 PM
> To: Tom Roche
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_perl setup for w2k?
>
>
> Well, when tugged the sleeve of a certain Unusually-Sized Rodent at
> ApacheCon about the future of Apache on Windows I was told that Apache
> will *not* support NT5 uh, I mean, Windows2000. Ken, is this still true?
>
> -kip
>
> Tom Roche wrote:
>
> > The courseware project on which I labor has been running on several
> > webserver/platforms, notably CGI on NT IIS and mod_perl on Apache on
> > Solaris. My boss has decided he'd like to see it on mod_perl on Apache
> > on Windows 2000. I've found the docs for "Using Apache With Microsoft
> > Windows," and especially enjoy the part
> >
> > http://apache.org/docs/windows.html
> > > Windows support is entirely experimental, and is recommended only
> > > for experienced users. The Apache Group does not guarantee that this
> > > software will work as documented, or even at all.
> >
> > :-) I've also found Randy Kobes' mod_perl binaries at
> >
> > ftp://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/pub/other/
> >
> > and am planning to try perl-win32-bin-0.6.exe. If anyone has already
> > gotten mod_perl running on w2k, I'd appreciate your recommendations
> > (or pointers to documentation) regarding
> >
> > * which Kobes binary you use, or
> >
> > * which Apache, Perl, etc you use
> >
> > * tips, tricks, traps, etc
> >
> > TIA, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
