> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 3:46 PM
> To: 'Geoffrey Young'; 'Modperl Mailing List (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: lookup_uri() / lookup_file() behavior
>
>
> > sounds right - if you're wondering whether using
> > push/set_handlers() would
> > apply to a subrequest, I would think not.
>
> That's exactly what I'm wondering.
>
> > and anyway, I tried a test case and couldn't get a pushed
> > fixup handler to register with the subrequest :)
>
> Try clearing the stack in the parent request before the subrequest is
> launched. Does it reappear in the subrequest?
well that's interesting - no it doesn't...
if I push a handler on the initial request, it doesn't show up in the
subrequest (as expected)
but if I undef a phase for the initial request, the subrequest doesn't
execute them either (not what I expect, at least).
looks like a bug?
well, get/set handlers is known to be problematic already - I know Doug et
al (hi Eric :) plan on (someday) re-implementing it, but for now, I guess
it's just another problem case :(
HTH
--Geoff
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
