On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> good morning...
>
> I'm a bit confused about $r->set_handlers and $r->push_handlers behavior.
> Both are listed in the eagle book as being per-request methods, but man
> Apache lists them both as server configuration directives. I think, though,
> that I'm seeing set_handlers as persisting with the child and push_handlers
> as being per-request. Personally, I'd rather have set_handlers per-request
> as well for situations where I want to add a handler but reorder it with the
> existing ones as well...
the {get,set}_handlers patch posted earlier should fix this behavior, can
you confirm? push_handlers() should probably also be implemented in terms
of r->per_request_config, rather than %Apache::PerlStackedHandlers.
