Hi there,

On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> 
> > Don't you get a message in error_log to the effect that a signal has
> > been received?
> 
> Sure, but I don't think that would help me do what I want.

What I meant was you could perhaps find the place in the code where it
did that and do something else there too...

73,
Ged.

Reply via email to