(exists doesn't work).
> Neither does delete.
Ok. But what should it do? What does it do for an array?
> And overloading doesn't really work properly.
Details?
> And reloading modules with phashes doesn't work right.
I steer clear of reloading, almost anything screws up.
> And sub-hashes doesn't work right ($pseudo->{Hash}{SubHash}).
Details? Works for me.
> And so on...
> All they do is hide a multitude of sins, for very little real world
> gain. Try it - convert your app back to non-pseudo hashes and see what
> performance you lose. I'm willing to bet its not a lot.
Well, obviously. Hashes aren't slow. But they are *BIG*.
--
John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
CalvaEDI SA. Tel: +33-1-4313-3131
66 rue du Moulin de la Pointe, Fax: +33-1-4313-3139
75013 PARIS.
- pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Tom_Roche
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data stru... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data ... Robin Berjon
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... DeWitt Clinton
- [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
