Robert Landrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've never tried this, but you could store things into main using > one handler and retrieve them with another, provided that you > cleaned up afterward. If, for any reason you failed to cleanup, the > server would leak memory... not that it doesn't already. It doesn't have to leak memory. If you're careful. I've had long lived processes doing non trivial stuff that've reached a maximum size and stayed there 'til Maxhits. (And that's not just individual server processes, but all the servers for that application.) -- Piers
- Passing data among handlers Paul J. Lucas
- Re: Passing data among handlers darren chamberlain
- Re: Passing data among handlers Robert Landrum
- slightly off-topic Piers Cawley
- slightly off-topic Wyman Eric Miles
- Re: slightly off-topic Blue Lang
- Re: slightly off-topic Vivek Khera
- Re: Passing data among handlers Kip Cranford
- RE: Passing data among handlers Geoffrey Young
- Re: Passing data among handlers Barry Hoggard
- Re: Passing data among handlers Drew Taylor
- Re: Passing data among handlers darren chamberlain
- Re: Passing data among handlers Perrin Harkins
- Re: Passing data among handlers Barry Hoggard