mod_perl 2.0
At 10:33 PM 2/28/2001 -1000, Kee Hinckley wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>At 9:44 AM +0800 3/1/01, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >At this moment anybody who has an access to mod_perl server can read any
> >data which is accessible by the same server. suexec is not an option
> >because of process persistance.
>
>I suspect this is why it is very easy to find hosting providers who
>provide PHP, and not as easy to find providers who support Embperl,
>Mason or other mod_perl solutions. Is there any effort to deal with
>this? (Per-virtual-server-process-sharing, with the option of
>dropping to zero processes, seems like a good start.) I'd really
>like to see languages like Embperl stand a better chance going
>head-to-head against PHP. It's very annoying to be able to whip
>together a great solution for my own servers, only to have to
>implement it for one of my clients in PHP, without nearly the power
>that Perl gives me.
>- --
>
>Kee Hinckley - Somewhere.Com, LLC - Cyberspace Architects
>Now Playing - Folk, Rock, odd stuff - http://www.somewhere.com/playlist.cgi
>
>I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
>responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
>everyone else's.
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>
>iQA/AwUBOp4JiyZsPfdw+r2CEQJoRACgmZsE3GpeM2AhH2ooYID9iDxlnwAAmwf8
>+sZ0r0rmQNuahRV07TpZ761e
>=BSof
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
__________________________________________________
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
