On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:46:31 +0000, Greg Cope wrote:
>There's no reason why Apache::DBI should not work - by the sounds of it
>the connections strings may have been different ?
>
>Apache::DBI works in an environment where on user ID is used to connect
>to the DB mulitple time. If you use two different connection strings
>Apache::DBI will try and make both persistent (IIRC).
>
>So check your DBI connection strings as they should be indentical.
Here is the problem: The connection strings _are_ the same. No
change at all between two connects... same host, same user, same
DB, even the same table (not that it bothers)... nothing
changes. That's the strange thing and that's what we didn't
understand at all and what pushed us to the point where we
disabled Apache::DBI.
Could it be that there is a connection between the socket
problem and the ever rising persistent connections? Maybe the
Apache::DBI cannot share an already connected handle because the
system says the socket is still in use and not free at all. That
would explain the unusual behaviour of Apache::DBI...
Maybe someone who hasn't an explaination could tell me at least
where to look at? Linux system? Apache? mod_perl? Mysql?
DBI/DBD?
Thanks anyway,
Jörn Janoschek.
KLAHOLD - We make IT work! - http://www.klahold.de
- WebDevelopment - http://www.klahold.de
- Content-Management-System - http://www.interred.de
