>> We should investigate how these 2 projects can work together when I'm
>> done so that RoboWeb 'recorded' sessions can create WWW::Automate methods
>> that utilise the structure of the page. The benefits of doing this are:
>> 1- Resultant scripts are easier to interpret
>> 2- Scripting apps that vary their form field names works.
CG> [..skip..]
CG> I look forward to seeing WWW::Automate and to working together on this.
I've recently become maintainer of another testing module
HTTP::WebTest. Stable version (released on CPAN) already has many
interesting features (like response time tests, text matching tests,
content size checks, support for both remote web server and local test
modes). I'm working on its rewrite in modular style where tests
modules are pluggable so it will be easily extendable. After finishing
with it I thought about writhing proxy that records users actions and
produces skeleton of test.
Maybe joining our efforts have some sense.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/) |
| GnuPG 1024D/323BDEE6 D7F7 561E 4C1D 8A15 8E80 E4AE BE1A 53EB 323B DEE6 |
| AGAVA Software Company (http://www.agava.com/) |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
