> My impression was that the locking in Apache::Session is a one-time lock
so
> it just fixes data integrity issues. So I am not sure if it is fancier
than
> Cache::Cache unless Cache::Cache has no locking at all (or no concept of
> lock choice).

What I meant was that since there is a separate locking API used to
implement  Apache::Session, it should be possible to just use, for example,
Apache::Session::Lock::Semaphore without using any other part of
Apache::Session.

- Perrin

Reply via email to