At 10:33 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote: >On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:04:26AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote: >> At 08:19 AM 12/06/01 -0800, Paul Lindner wrote: >> >> Ok, hit me over the head. Why wouldn't you want to use a caching proxy? > >Apache::CacheContent gives you more control over the caching process >and keeps the expiration headers from leaking to the browser.
Ok, I see. >Or maybe you want to dynamically control the TTL? Would you still use it with a front-end lightweight server? Even with caching, a mod_perl server is still used to send the cached file (possibly over 56K modem), right? Bill Moseley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
