Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: >>>Wouldn't that affect mod_perl's advantage of sharing the modules? I >>>mean, would everything be in it's separate namespace and loaded only >>>once for every module as it is with use? >>> > > I don't know about you guys, but I don't feel that sharing the modules > is that much of an advantage.
It is. It can save you a lot of memory. Check the numbers in the performance and scenario chapters of the mod_perl guide. > If you write large scripts that actually > use modules of your own which can be different depending on the version > of the script, it means that you cannot run different versions of the > script on the same box, which IMHO is not very convenient... But this has nothing to do with sharing. You've this problem when you share or not. modperl-2.0 solves this problem. In 1.x you have to use various workarounds, some of the are explained in the guide. > Do you know if there's a way to avoid this? > Cheers, > -- _____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
