"Jay Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In my development I neglected to supply the Apache request object when > I called Apache::Request->new( $r ). Actually $r was undef. It still > works! I am just wondering if this is expected behaviour and if it > will be supported going forward or was this just a fluke?
I'd say it's a fluke- $r needs to be attached somehow to the actual request object; otherwise I think you're introducing a memory leak and/or possibly a segfault. Unless Doug says otherwise, I wouldn't rely on this behavior for an undef'd arg to Apache::Request::new. -- Joe Schaefer
