"Vuillemot, Ward W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Has anyone ever thought to have the table name modifiable? E.g. instead of >'sessions', you could set it to something like 'preferences' for a given >instance. I wanted to maintain session information, but also preferences >that are attached to a given username. I could just put the two within the >same table. . .but as I am anal, I would rather see the data separated. > >I was thinking of doing it myself -- but thought it might be a worthwhile >mod for the entire community. And it saves me maintaining two sets of >nearly identical code...and of course, there might be good reasons NOT to do >this. > >Ideas? Thoughts?
I would love to see this, but am not sure how it would be implemented (don't want to design something without the author's input). I'm wanting to use it to track sessions and contexts -- sessions can own multiple contexts and contexts can pass from session to session. Basically break identity apart from process. Apache::Session would be ideal for both since the storage mechanisms are identical. Unfortunately, the table name is hard-coded. -- James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 979-862-3725 Texas A&M CIS Operating Systems Group, Unix
