At 04:11 26.04.2002, Stas Bekman wrote: >Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: >>At 22:04 25.04.2002, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: >> >>>At 21:39 25.04.2002, Lihn, Steve wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>>I am testing the Apache::Echo connection handler for Apache2 and >>>>mod_perl 2. >>>>But encounter the following error: >>>> >>>>[Thu Apr 25 15:32:15 2002] [error] failed to resolve handler `Apache::Echo' >>>>[Thu Apr 25 15:32:15 2002] [error] Bareword "Apache::OK" not allowed while >>>>"strict subs" in use at C:\Apache2/blib/lib/Apache2/Apache/Echo.pm line 25. >>>>Compilation failed in require at (eval 2) line 3. >>>> >>>>What do I miss? >>> >>> >>>Try adding >>>use Apache::Const qw/:common/; >>>at the top >>> >>>and replace return Apache::OK with >>>return OK; >>> >>>Seems like the docs say Apache::OK everywhere, but I don't know if this >>>is supposed to work or not. >> >>Or actually, looking at the files in t/, it's probably better to do: >>use Apache::Const -compile => 'OK'; >>And leave the Apache::OK line as is. > >I've adjusted all the tests in t/ a few weeks ago, e.g.: >http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol/echo.pm?rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > >while 1.99 beta was released your best bet is to always use cvs version of >httpd and mod_perl before it's released for real. So you can benefit from >all the fixes reported since the release and new developments.
Yes, Stas, but I think this example was taken from the docs: http://perl.apache.org/preview/modperl-docs/dst_html/docs/2.0/user/overview/overview.html#Apache__Echo These examples need to be synced with the CVS versions then. -- Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
