On Sunday, April 28, 2002, at 04:48 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: > it does solve the problem on linux. Ken, can you test the > bleadperl? This fix was applied as a solution. If `pwd` doesn't > work for you, that sucks! Meaning that the problem wasn't fixed > in bleadperl :( Can you check the recent Cwd thread on p5p > (started by me) and try running cwd.t under -T?
All bleadperl tests pass for me, except 'ext/DB_File/t/db-recno' which I think is known to fail. Both Cwd tests pass, in particular: ext/Cwd/t/cwd.......................ok ext/Cwd/t/taint.....................ok But you mention running them with -T - how do I do that? >> If I also do "$ENV{PATH} = '/bin';" after that, the server >> gets farther before failing (this is with a fully static >> build - I'm giving up on APACI for now, I get link errors >> there). Now I get this error in t/logs/error_log: >> ============ >> Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch. >> Callback called exit. >> ============ >> Doesn't exactly tell me where to start looking for the error, >> anyone have hints? The above is the entire contents of the >> log. > > Doug has started fixing this problem, but didn't finish. See: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=101880934700003&r=1&w=2 Hmm, I'm now seeing different behavior than what I saw before. Using APACI and your Cwd.pm patch, the server never started, nor did it create t/logs/error_log. I just tried it now with a simple static build, though, and it did succeed. All mod_perl tests pass, though there are lots of warnings during the tests about "Can't exec 'pwd': No such file or directory". That's to be expected? -Ken