all- Perhaps I am making a mistaken assumption, but just in case I wanted to support my assumptions with some real data.
Can anyone point me to some script resources, or maybe just the results of their own experience on the performance of SSIs in apache vs. converting a site to a database-driven scenario. My assumption is, of course, that if the requirements are simple, go with the simplest solution. Basically, I broke the site up into includes executed via SSI. My question would be, is there any drastic improvement (CPU, memory, download time, server processes, whatever) that would be gained by switching to some kind of mod_perl templating system? These are all static pages. I think all I'm asking about is a performance comparison for a site comprised of 95% static content between Apache SSI and a mod_perl db/template system. thanks- grant stevens http://l-eet.com PS. RTFM answers are fine as long as the particular FM is specified. :)
