> I think you should consider using a system that is actually > supported. > Embperl, Apache::ASP, Text::Template, and Mason all have > similar syntax > to ePerl. There are lots of other things on CPAN that might be even > closer in syntax, but are not as widely used and well supported. > > > I just can't understand where the Apache::ePerl > > bug can be -- > > it so simple and so clear module.. and it worked on older perl! > > You should go through the change log for Perl 5.8 then, since > something > that changed between 5.6 and 5.8 must be causing problems for you. > > > where is all community? it's so silent in the conference. what the > > language > > perl programmers migrated to? JSP, PHP? :( > > Are you asking why more people aren't responding to your question? > Probably because almost no one uses ePerl any more. >
Thank you Perrin for you responses! Embperl, Apache::ASP, Text::Template, and Mason (!) all are great, but .. they all great for middle size web sites, not WML & WAP, in cases where (some) people prefer php to Perl. I think I should just patch A::Registry with function that converts eperl script to perl script and let eperl live some more time :-) > Are you asking why more people aren't responding to your question? > Probably because almost no one uses ePerl any more. no, I just looked at number of newbies and posts.. Anyway It helped and I found the bug ;-) -vlad
