On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
[ .. ]
Search your filesystem, you must have Apache/Response.pm if you have installed mp2.
It seems that you have a messed up installation, as your ModPerl/Registry.pm resides under non-Apache2 subdir and you have /Apache/Apache2/lib/perl. Did you have some old mod_perl install? Both ModPerl/Registry.pm and Apache/Response.pm are supposed to live under the same directory. I hope you didn't just go and copy ModPerl/Registry.pm manually, leaving out the rest.
Actually, ModPerl::Registry appearing as a lib/ModPerl/Registry.pm and Apache::Response appearing as a lib/Apache2/Apache/Response.pm does happen with Win32, which is different than Unix, where both appear under a lib/Apache2/.
So is that a MakeMaker thing. It's a definite a bug and it needs to be fixed.
Though I'd check blib/ first. If the two don't reside under the same directory it may as well be a bug in ModPerl::BuildMM which arranges for 2.0 modules to be under Apache2/ subdir.
> That's why, if you miss loading > the Apache2.pm module, ModPerl::Registry is found, > but not Apache::Response.
It's just that Patricio's report had:
(@INC contains: D:/Perl/lib D:/Perl/site/lib . D:/Apache/Apache2/ D:/Apache/Apache2/lib/perl)
with Apache2 in it, so for a moment I thought that he had Apache2 included. Does the ppm that you maintain include startup.pl or some other file, where we could include 'use Apache2;' on behalf of users? I guess they will still have to include it from httpd.conf, unless you supply the latter and we should just put it there then.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-- Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
