On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:44:06AM +0000, Ged Haywood wrote: > Stas is probably in bed now. :)
Nope. :-) > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > > no backtrace > > You need to run Apache under gdb (Gnu DeBugger). > You run it like that, let it segfault, then you're returned to the debugger. > You tell the debugger to give you a backtrace with the debugger's 'bt' command. > > No, it's not clear in the 2.0 doc's. Not really. > Check out > > http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/help.html#How_to_Report_Problems I don't actually have to backtrace it under gbd's control, do I? If I can convince it to dump core somewhere usable, that's enough? And my mod_perl's an .so; is that gonna screw things up? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 Come see Linux Gazette in our new home: www.linuxgazette.net! -- Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
